Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Vote on Lafarge mining could be soon

Stan Salva says there are many points to consider

By Michael Glover - michael.glover@examiner.net
Posted Mar 08, 2010 @ 11:54 PM
Print Comment

The Sugar Creek Board of Aldermen Monday instructed the city attorney to draft a rough ordinance on whether to allow Lafarge North America to mine a section of Sugar Creek.

The ordinance could  be presented at the next board meeting on March 29, where aldermen could vote on the document.

Lafarge wants the 88 acres, which Sugar Creek incorporated two years ago, because it’s rich in Bethany Falls limestone. Last year, they submitted a rezoning request that would have led to a second request for a special use permit for the company to mine the land. However, last December the city’s planning and zoning commission rejected the rezoning request.

Further mining would affect 1,400 homes, three churches, an elementary school and a mental health facility. A group was formed two years ago called Cedar Crest, Swearingen, Farview Concerned Citizens to represent the neighbors and fight Lafarge’s request, saying blasting that is already happening in the area is affecting the quality of life and further blasting would only add misery.

Mayor Stanley Salva addressed the issue, first by reading a prepared statement and commenting after the reading the statement.

Salva did not say if he would vote for or against mining. The mayor only votes in the event of a tie.

The economic benefits from the mining for Sugar Creek would be years, perhaps a decade, from now.

“In looking at the economic impact on the city, we have to look down the road,” Salva said. “Our main revenue sources right now are Lafarge and from the landfill.  We already know the landfill (contract) has a sunset and revenues would cease. Down the road, maybe for our children and grandchildren, we’ve got to be concerned about the economic impact on the city.”

About the effect future mining could have on neighbors, Salva said:

“We’re concerned about your quality of life. But we’re also concerned about the residents of Sugar Creek. We have to seek some happy medium. It maybe approving mining with a number of restrictions or it maybe disapproving. I don’t know. It’s going to be this board’s decision to make.”

Salva read a statement. It was his opinion and not that of the board.

The economic benefit to the city for the rock removal activity is short-term and of minor economic value, Salva said in the statement. The real potential of the proposal is the creation of substantial underground industrial space that can provide tax revenues and considerable jobs, the mayor said.

The Sugar Creek Board of Aldermen Monday instructed the city attorney to draft a rough ordinance on whether to allow Lafarge North America to mine a section of Sugar Creek.

The ordinance could  be presented at the next board meeting on March 29, where aldermen could vote on the document.

Lafarge wants the 88 acres, which Sugar Creek incorporated two years ago, because it’s rich in Bethany Falls limestone. Last year, they submitted a rezoning request that would have led to a second request for a special use permit for the company to mine the land. However, last December the city’s planning and zoning commission rejected the rezoning request.

Further mining would affect 1,400 homes, three churches, an elementary school and a mental health facility. A group was formed two years ago called Cedar Crest, Swearingen, Farview Concerned Citizens to represent the neighbors and fight Lafarge’s request, saying blasting that is already happening in the area is affecting the quality of life and further blasting would only add misery.

Mayor Stanley Salva addressed the issue, first by reading a prepared statement and commenting after the reading the statement.

Salva did not say if he would vote for or against mining. The mayor only votes in the event of a tie.

The economic benefits from the mining for Sugar Creek would be years, perhaps a decade, from now.

“In looking at the economic impact on the city, we have to look down the road,” Salva said. “Our main revenue sources right now are Lafarge and from the landfill.  We already know the landfill (contract) has a sunset and revenues would cease. Down the road, maybe for our children and grandchildren, we’ve got to be concerned about the economic impact on the city.”

About the effect future mining could have on neighbors, Salva said:

“We’re concerned about your quality of life. But we’re also concerned about the residents of Sugar Creek. We have to seek some happy medium. It maybe approving mining with a number of restrictions or it maybe disapproving. I don’t know. It’s going to be this board’s decision to make.”

Salva read a statement. It was his opinion and not that of the board.

The economic benefit to the city for the rock removal activity is short-term and of minor economic value, Salva said in the statement. The real potential of the proposal is the creation of substantial underground industrial space that can provide tax revenues and considerable jobs, the mayor said.

 The proposed mining project would provide 1,500 jobs but a dollar amount the mining would generate couldn’t be estimated right now.

“This increase would have a tremendous impact upon our economic base here in the city,” Salva said in the statement.

The decision must consider the environmental and aesthetic impact to neighbors in the area.

There must be multiple stipulations Lafarge must follow if mining should happen. Salva’s recommendation is to include a sunset date for mining that hopefully will not exceed five years.

The blasting limits must be reduced below current city standards.

A penalty schedule must be established by the city for dust and blasting violations.

An oversight committee should be created to monitor compliance and neighbors of the blasting area would have chances to report to the committee on conditions from the blasting.

 

Loading commenting interface...

Site Services
Contact Us
Subscribe
Place an Ad
Yellow Pages
Online Submissions
Engagements
Weddings
Births
Anniversaries