Last weekend, I had the privilege of hearing Katie Rodriguez Bannister speak. Katie is not a lawyer, but she was speaking to a room full of lawyers on a hot summer day at the Lake of the Ozarks. Katie was introduced by her lawyer, John Wallach, a good friend of mine from St. Louis, and for an hour, while others rushed off to the swimming pools and golf courses, Katie commanded the attention of approximately 200 lawyers.
Katie is a quadriplegic, confined to a wheelchair as the result of a single-car accident in 1990, and she spoke to us about her life as a quadriplegic.
All of us in the room knew the name of Katie Rodriguez, her maiden name. Her name is associated with two Missouri Supreme Court decisions arising out of her lawsuit against Suzuki. On two different occasions, her lawyers presented a case for trial in St. Louis against Suzuki because Katie suffered her injuries in a Suzuki Samurai, a sport utility vehicle. Katie had been a passenger in the SUV operated by a friend. The friend lost control of the vehicle and it rolled over, causing crush damage to the roof of the Samurai and as a result, Katie’s neck was broken and she was paralyzed from the chest down.
Katie claimed that the vehicle had a design defect that gave the Samurai a propensity to roll over in emergency driving situations like that encountered by the driver of Katie’s vehicle. Katie was required to prove that the rollover propensity made the Samurai unreasonably dangerous when put to a reasonably anticipated use.
In the first trial, the jury awarded Katie $30 million in actual damages for her injuries and $60 million in punitive damages to punish Suzuki for its conscious disregard for human life. The trial judge reduced both awards to $20 million. Then, in her first trip to the Missouri Supreme Court, the court decided that evidence of the driver’s intoxication and Katie’s prior consumption of alcohol should have been presented to the jury, and reversed the jury verdicts and remanded the case for a new trial.
Suzuki should have been careful what it asked for, because in the second trial, the jury awarded Katie $25 million in compensatory damages and $11.9 million in punitive damages. The trial judge reduced the compensatory damages to $20 million, the same amount from the first trial. This occurred despite evidence that the driver of Katie’s vehicle was intoxicated and that Katie had also been drinking.
Again, Suzuki appealed the verdict to the Missouri Supreme Court and once again the court reversed the jury’s verdict and remanded the case for yet a third trial. The basis for reversal of the second verdict was a determination that the trial judge erred when he failed to admit reports from the National Highway Transportation Safety Commission published six years after Katie’s accident.