Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Correction

By The Examiner's Editorial Board
Posted Feb 05, 2010 @ 11:55 PM
Print Comment

The Examiner incorrectly stated in this space Friday and in an earlier story this week the amount of additional property tax that would be owed by the owner of a $100,000 home had the 40-cent property tax increase been approved in Buckner this week. The increase would have been $76.
 
The Examiner apologizes for the error, but stands behind its viewpoint stated Friday that the increase would have been significant for taxpayers, and the proposal was ill-conceived.
 

The Examiner incorrectly stated in this space Friday and in an earlier story this week the amount of additional property tax that would be owed by the owner of a $100,000 home had the 40-cent property tax increase been approved in Buckner this week. The increase would have been $76.
 
The Examiner apologizes for the error, but stands behind its viewpoint stated Friday that the increase would have been significant for taxpayers, and the proposal was ill-conceived.
 

Loading commenting interface...

Site Services
Contact Us
Subscribe
Place an Ad
Yellow Pages
Online Submissions
Engagements
Weddings
Births
Anniversaries